November 11, 2009

can we try harder?

dear arabic 201,

i thought we’d started off on a good foot, what with my visceral manifesto (“i will learn arabic or i will die”) fueling my desire to study every day. then, i realized how fantastic my arabic friends are and i studied with them even more. the midterm was coming up, and as you very well know i studied my little tush off every night to make sure i had the grammar down pat. i didn’t even cry when we tossed al-kitaab 1 aside and started the new, much harder textbook.

today i got the midterm back and even though i didn’t do the best in the class (i didn’t even get an a) i felt satisfied. satisfied in my reading comprehension and verb conjugations and sometimes even my speaking. satisfied in my ability to excel at something i’m not very good at.

we’re not done yet. next stop’s cairo.

becca

November 8, 2009

It’s time for an update.

Before you all think I’ve disappeared into my studies (mostly true) and allowed the blog to slip into the cybersphere (not true), let me remind you that I am a very busy college student. No emphasis added.

I don’t have much to complain about. Life is deliciously surprising. I’ll spend five weeks with a set plan in my head for the semester only to meet someone or hear something that changes my mind. And I’ll start the planning process all over again. I’m being deliberately vague.

For example, I have five (girl) friends who have put in their mission papers. And I’m starting to think about law school again. A cast of new people have entered and reentered my life, forcing me to rethink what in the world I am going to do in the world.

Meanwhile, the lyrics to a Jenny Lewis song have been running through my mind for weeks now (“you are what you love and not what loves you back”), which kind of reminds me of Elder Uchdorf’s conference talk about loving the Lord. The Lord doesn’t need us to love Him, we need to love the Lord in order to perfect ourselves.

 

October 19, 2009

The library

I’ve spent the last two hours in the Harold B. Lee library, combing the bookshelves and running my fingers along the spines of books I need to tilt my head to read.

I love libraries.

I love the hunt of searching for a book. One single book. This library shelves literally hundreds of thousands of books. My topic of study today is A’isha bint Abu Bakr and how an evolving Islamic community has appropriated (and misappropriated) its own values onto A’isha. I’m looking for Chosen Among Women: Mary and Fatima in Medieval Christianity and Shi’ite Islam. I turn the corner, enter the Religion reference library, walk straight down the hallway, pass Provo’s elderly that are staring at blown-up microfiche, and enter the BP section. I love getting to the back shelves, where it’s deserted and quiet.

I found the book I needed but distraction took the form of Kurdish Nationalism and Political Islam in Turkey. It’s invigorating to read just for the sake of reading, all schoolwork aside. We are being trained here to become lifelong learners. At a meeting of the Political Science Honors Society, Valerie Hudson, a Political Science professor, LDS feminist, and all-around rockin’ woman, told us: “If you don’t carry a book in your backpack that is unrelated to your schoolwork, then you are not taking full advantage of your secondary education.”

Thirty minutes later, I leave this Twilight Zone in BP and return to my research, my essay, my homework. But I’ve got a few extra books stuffed into my bag.

Maybe this is another reason I love the library, but don’t the tall shelves remind you of playing hide-and-seek in the public library back home? Trina and I used to duck behind those shelves at the Scarsdale Public Library when we were younger and I always think about that when I’m in a library.

September 21, 2009

A letter to Elton John from the office of the NASA Administrator.

If you haven’t been keeping up on McSweeney’s pop correspondences, I’d suggest you start.  Read this mock letter here.

Dear Mr. John,

This letter is to inform you of your termination from the NASA astronaut program. Our decision comes after a great deal of deliberation, and while we take no pleasure in terminating you, we felt it was the only choice we had.

Your offenses have been many. To begin with, we had hoped that after all the hundreds of hours of training you received, you would understand the measures in place to prepare a crew for a launch. So when you showed up, preflight, with a bag packed by your wife, that rubbed a lot of people the wrong way. Jewelry? Oversize sunglasses? Sandwiches? On a rocket flight? That’s poor judgment, Mr. John. I don’t know if that’s the way it’s done in the rocky-roll world that you’re used to, but at NASA we don’t pack our own luggage.

You should also know that many on the ground crew mentioned that at zero hour (9 a.m.) you seemed to be intoxicated, possibly “high,” as the hippies say. At the time, I thought that to be a baseless accusation and, since we had a mission to launch, I disregarded it. But the transmissions you made once the craft had entered its orbit made me wonder. Over and over we would ask for your readings on the effects of weightlessness, the craft’s condition, and the status of the numerous scientific experiments onboard, but instead of giving us that information, you moped about missing the Earth and missing your wife and being lonely in space. Well, goddamn it, Mr. John, you knew what you were getting yourself into up there! It’s not like riding on a rocky-roll tour bus! Of course it’s lonely! It’s space! Do you realize there are millions of people who’d give anything to be up there? It’s a chance of a lifetime! And you’re crying like a damn baby!

We expect a great deal from our astronauts, but perhaps the most important part of the job is an understanding of science. For our top men—Armstrong, Aldrin, and the like—understanding the science is more than a 9-to-5 job; they work at it seven days a week. Frankly, sir, I doubt your scientific acumen. After demanding data from you for days, you were only able to offer this insight: “Mars ain’t the kind of place to raise your kids. In fact, it’s cold as hell. And there’s no one there to raise them if you did.” First off, if you did what? That doesn’t even make sense. Secondly, we did not send you up there to evaluate whether Mars is fit for human habitation or child rearing. Thirdly, your mission was not even going to Mars.

And another thing, the word is “astronaut.” When you run around Cape Canaveral saying “I’m a rocket man!” it’s embarrassing for everyone.

I am sorry to give you this information while you are still on your mission, Mr. John, and we realize that it’s going to be a long, long time until touchdown brings you back here. But NASA felt that your performance was so dismal that we must act immediately. You are simply not the man we thought you were when we hired you for this position. Please consider all future assignments canceled. Your place will be taken by Major Tom, who we expect will be a more dedicated and reliable member of the team.

Sincerely,

James C. Fletcher
NASA Administrator

September 16, 2009

IC: Three new movies

I’m busy on campus all the time.  I have limited money.  I don’t have a car.  I don’t like the movies they show in the Varsity Theater.  Not even Blockbuster has a good selection of foreign films.  Enter International Cinema.  Since I was encouraged my freshman year to attend IC for a writing class, I’ve become a junkie.  The past two weeks have featured a number of great international films.  These are the three I’ve seen so far.

1. He Loves Me He Loves Me Not (A la folie…pas du tout)

The tagline (“there are two sides to every story”) might have tipped you off that this is not a love story.  The first half of the film might have you fooled.  Angelique, a young and coquettish art student, is irrevocably in love with a married doctor at the university.  We see pieces of their failed romance, including missed meetings and a never-realized trip to Florence together, ending in Angelique’s heartbroken suicide.  The movie is turned on its head when we rewind to the beginning and view the supposed ‘romance’ through the eyes of a bewildered doctor who is suffering at the hands of an unknown stalker.

2. Decalogue I (Dekalog)

The first in a Decalogue of ten movies about the ten commandments, Decalogue I demonstrates the dangers of trusting in the capacity of man’s reason above faith in God.  A man has brought up his son Pavel as a subscriber to the religion of logic and reason, best represented by the glowing computer in their apartment.  The computer becomes the focus of Pavel’s life as it aptly solves mathematical problems of increasing difficulty.  His father, a linguistics professor at the local university and an atheist, pollutes his son with humanistic naturalism, failing to provide spiritual instruction.  But one wintry day the computer’s calculations are wrong.  The ice isn’t, as the computer determined, thick enough to support Pavel.

Polish filmmaker Krysztof Piesiewicz is a master of detail (read more about the entire series here).  The simple story is beautifully woven with moments of cinematic excellence: the cracking of the ink bottle paralleling the cracking of the ice, the omnipresent man (God) sitting by the lake, candle wax splashing over the face of the black Madonna and drying on her cheeks as tears.

3. In the Mood for Love (Fa yeung nin wa)

I’ve never been an avid fan of Chinese filmmakers, but Kar Wai Wong breaths new life into a beautiful piece about doomed lovers and their forbidden love.  The pair, Mr. Chow and Mrs. Chen are next-door neighbors in a Hong Kong apartment complex in the 1960s.  Fate throws them together when it is determined that their respective spouses are engaged in an illicit affair in Japan.  What begins as nightly meet-ups to fill their solitude evolves into a romance that neither is willing to engage in.  The pair agrees “not to be like them” and resists temptation, despite remaining madly in love with one another.

The film is slow-paced and picks bits and pieces of conversation over the course of months, perhaps years, so we never get a direct sense of time.  The only framework we get as an audience is its cinematic “moments”; the haunting score by Michael Galasso is accomanied by slow motion sequences of, e.g. Chan walking in her elegent dresses, Chan and Chow “glancing” at each other as they pass one another on the stairs, and other beautiful scenes which make this film the cinematic gem it is.  The film’s ending, tied to something Chow mentioned earlier about whispering a secret into a hole, is equally moving.

Roger Ebert says:

Instead of asking us to identify with this couple, as an American film would, Wong asks us to empathize with them; that is a higher and more complex assignment, with greater rewards.

Read more of his review here.

September 9, 2009

Gustav Bauernfeind

I adore paintings by Gustav Bauernfeind, a turn-of-the-century Orientalist painter who depicted scenes based off his experiences in the Middle East.  My favorite is The Wailing Wall, which sold for nearly 4.5 million dollars.

When I arrived in the country [ Jerusalem] nearly one and a half years ago I wanted to try my hand at landscapes, in regard to which I was not really aware of having embarked on a new field whose difficulties I might not be able to surmount. But the solemnity of mood in the late evenings and early mornings brought it home to me, and when all else has been subject to change and has more often repelled than attracted the observer, then no one will dispute that landscape has on the whole held on to its character.

- Gustav Bauernfeind

September 7, 2009

Amoun

As part of one of my classes, we’ve been required to write a Personal Statement, something that could be used to apply to law school or graduate school in the future.  We were encouraged to link together 2-3 stories that illustrate one of our strong qualities.  I guess you’d call it the “golden thread” (thanks, Brother Skinner) that runs through a personal narrative.

I sat down to write.  I thought about Jerusalem, and what could I write about that would make me appear charismatic or hardworking or independent or human.  As soon as I started writing about Jerusalem’s Domari community Didi and I visited, however, I found that the assignment evolved into something very different.  Read on, let me know if you like it.  I’m thinking about writing a few short stories about my experiences abroad.  Disclaimer: this is not my Personal Statement.

The taxi driver was inexplicably lost.  When we’d approached the man at a produce market outside of Damascus Gate, he’d signaled that he’d understood my garbled murmors in Arabic and agreed to take my friend and me to the address scribbled on the back of a travel pamphlet.  Now, as we zipped through the back allies of Jerusalem and zigzagged through midday traffic, my friend and I were not entirely sure the driver had his bearings.  “Should we call?” I ventured, hoping for a response.  Nothing.  I repeated my question hestitantly in Arabic; a quick nod and a curt “aywa” was all the affirmation I needed to pull out my phone and dial Amoun’s number.  Amoun was a single, middle-aged woman living in Jerusalem, an anomaly in the Arab society in which she was raised.  Amoun’s irregularity was reinforced further by her matriarchal status in the community she had amassed and sustained for over twenty years.  Neither Palestinian nor Israeli, Amoun and her community were Domari gypsies, though a far cry from the Roma one encounters in Paris or Italy.  The Domari were proud of their non-Palestinian heritage and resented the label “dirty gypsy” they had been given by Jerusalem’s other inhabitants.  According to the pamphlet, Jerusalem’s small community of 100 Domari families descended from Indian migrants who had journeyed to Palestine in waves during the seventeenth century.

A short conversation with Amoun reassured our driver, who pulled a U-turn in full traffic and continued in the opposite direction until we’d located the sign labeled “Domari Gypsies” in Arabic.  Everything in Jerusalem appeared sand-colored, its beige contours indistinguishable from the desert surrounding the city.  The Gypsy building was no exception, except that its walls were a little dirtier, a little more grime-covered when examined up close.  My friend and I approached the door and rang, unsure of how we’d be received.

Our visit, as much as I disliked the idea, was largely business in nature.  The study program which had facilitated this four-month sojourn in Jerusalem had, in past semesters, encouraged students to serve the Gypsy community by teaching English or instructing women to use sewing machines.  Under the program’s new administration, however, such volunteer efforts had been rescinded.  It was now our task, mine and Didi’s, to soften the blow which had already been dealt the previous week.

“I don’t understand,” Amoun started irately.  “Last semester students from your church were coming every week to help teach and tutor.  We got many new clothes for our women from a donation.  Our children were finally learning, even those who’d dropped out of school.  What happened? Why can’t you help us?

Amoun threw her hands emphatically in the air to illustrate her frustration but her eyes revealed fear and distrust.  As the head of her community, the responsibility for feeding and teaching the homeless children lay squarely on her shoulders.  Without anyone to turn to, facing rejection from every facet of society, Amoun had grown distrustful of everyone around her.  Fear had hardened her and made her cynical.  This fresh disappointment seemed just another rejection in a long line of rejections.  Didi and I exchanged a look of helplessness before jumping into our explanation.  We explained that we couldn’t officially set up a volunteer program without permission from our church back in America.  The Domari could not depend on us so heavily, we said.  What would happen if a Third Intifada broke out and we were sent home?  How, then, would the community survive without our help?

Trained from childhood in English, Amoun heard our explanations perfectly.  But she didn’t understand.  She couldn’t understand.  Even as I was speaking, I felt my hollow words shrivel and disintegrate in the face of Amoun’s colossal worries.  Convinced of her own aloneness, Amoun had developed traits of self-sufficiency and resilience from a young age.  She dropped out of school, a source of torment and intolerance from her Palestinian peers, and worked through her adolescence to support a starving family.  She was a sole Crusader, a woman on a mission to save her family and usher in a new era of acceptance from Jerusalem’s Arab population.  Her wrinkled face was leathery and dark,  an abnormality in a city where women dutifully smothered their faces in white foundation in order to fit their perception of Western standards of beauty.  Amoun would never be accepted by those women, no matter how hard she fought for recognition from community leaders or the Israeli government, because she was Domari.  Even within Jerusalem’s Domari population, an authoritative, vocal woman like Amoun was a source of embarrassment, not strength.  Her independence was both a saving grace and her greatest weakness.

Since my conversation with Amoun, I’ve been forced to evaluate my own life with a critical eye.  Was there inherent value, as I’d been taught, in being independent?  Could I ever hope to attain personal victories on my own?  Had my own inner drive and personal crusades ever hardened me to the idea of success?  Does acceptance from others constitute a triumph?   I’ve since learned that while independence is a critical—no—vital quality to existence against insurmountable odds, nothing can be achieved alone.  Amoun believed she’d failed before she’d even tried because more than her cause, she believed was alone.  You are not alone, I repeat to myself.  You are never alone.

September 2, 2009

A Manifesto

For my history of the Middle East class, we are reading Bulliet’s “The Case for Islamo-Christian Civilization,” which argues that Islam and the West are not so irreconcilable as Steven Huntington (“Clash of Civilizations” theorist) would have us believe.  He proposes that a new label “Islamo-Christian” is just as valid as the traditional “Judeo-Christian” delineation.  Here’s the clincher:

“Looked at as a whole, and in historical perspective, the Islamo-Christian world has much more binding it together than forcing it apart.  The past and future of the West cannot be fully comprehended without appreciation of the twinned relationship it has had with Islam over some fourteen centuries.  The case for Islamo-Christian civilization as an organizing principle of contemporary thought it rooted in the historical reality of those centuries.  One might hope that historians of Western Civilization and of Islam will see the value of readjusting their perspectives to take this reality into account.  But our society cannot wait for the sluggish current of historiographical reflection to carve a new channel.  The case for Islamo-Christian civilization rests more immediately on the need of all Americans to find common ground with our Muslim diaspora communities at a time when suspicion, fear draconian government action, and demagoguery increasingly threaten to divide us.  Islamo-Christian civilization is a concept we desperately need if we are to have any hope of turning an infamous day of tragedy into a historic moment of social and religious inclusion.”

And, a manifesto:

Please overhaul all my plans for this year.  I’m studying Arabic, four hours a day, every day.

You can find me in the library if you need me.

August 24, 2009

Final days

Our last day in Jerusalem was spent with an incredible Palestinian family I’ve come to love over the past few months.  Nuha and her daughters Aya and Asiil have been warm and accepting from the get-go.  We’ve spent countless hours talking, dancing, singing, walking, eating, lounging at their house.  Here are just a few moments from our last day.

IMG_5450

IMG_5456

IMG_5489

IMG_5493

IMG_5519

IMG_5590

IMG_5589

IMG_5592

IMG_5686

<3

August 24, 2009

رِحْلِة الأَلْف مِيل تَبْدَأ بِخَطْوَة

The journey of a thousand miles starts with one step.  That’s what the Arabic proverb says, at least.

Someone else, a long time ago, echoed the same idea.  The Book of Mormon tells us that “by small and simple things are great things brought to pass,” confounding the wise (Alma 37:6).

What is it about the small things?  Why are we so hung up on getting the little things done, orienting our minds to life’s details?